It feels unfair, somehow, to complain that Jacqueline Carey is recycling her characters when I really did enjoy the book. But I've already read one book of hers involving an unbelievably beautiful young woman who is the specially chosen one of a deity; falls into bed with most of the other major characters; and is attracted to a tremendously skilled fighting man who disapproves of her morals but is nonetheless forced into her company, with predictable results. That book was Kushiel's Dart, the first of Carey's novels set in an alternate-Europe in which France is Terre d'Ange, home of the d'Angelines: descendants of the gods, preternaturally beautiful, and living for uninhibited sex love. This latest book, remarkably similar in setup, is Naamah's Kiss (Grand Central, June 2009), though that's a poor title, since the major god-relationship of the book is not with Naamah but with the eponymous bear-goddess of the Maghuin Dhonn, the mysterious original settlers of Alba (alternate-Britain) last seen sadly wreaking havoc in Kushiel's Justice. I guess Maghuin Dhonn's Unspecified Destiny doesn't quite have the same ring to it.
So, having read about these people before, it was pretty obvious where the interpersonal plot was going. But the story actually worked fairly well for me. Carey has skipped ahead several generations to a new group of characters descended from the now-legendary figures of the first six books. This gives her some breathing room and makes the whole thing feel a little fresher, as does a trip to Ch'in (alternate-China) which allows her to introduce an interesting celestial dragon into the mix. Returning to a female protagonist also seems to help. Said protagonist is Moirin, daughter of a woman of the Maghuin Dhonn and a d'Angeline priest of Naamah. This joint heritage metaphysically loads her down with (1) a destiny-with-a-capital-D that drives her to travel from Alba to Terre d'Ange and eventually to Ch'in, and (2) an uncontrollable desire to leap into bed with a half-dozen other major and minor characters, male and female. Those turned off by the kinkiness of the encounters in the Kushiel books will find the much more conventional erotic repertoire of this book easier to take, however.
In the first Kushiel trilogy it took Carey two full books to raise her heroine to adulthood and move from pseudo-Europe to more exotic lands. This time she does it all in one, so the plot moves along at a fairly brisk pace. That briskness does make Moirin's rapid adjustments to d'Angeline and later Ch'in society a little hard to swallow, though, given how much verbiage is expended early on about how little Moirin knows about or likes civilization after having been raised alone in the wilderness by her mother.
Morin, however, is refreshingly normal, with small powers that have unexpectedly wide applications and a destiny that does not involve saving the world repeatedly, at least in this book. I'd sort of hoped it would be a standalone, but the ending leaves me in no doubt that a sequel at least is in the works. I hope it doesn't go to a trilogy; both previous ones worked well for two books and then jumped the shark in the third. But this is a complete story on its own and has enough new twists that I can forgive the stock Carey characters.
The cover follows the same design principles as the previous six books, with a half-dressed woman (Moirin, one assumes) shown from behind. It is marred for me by the large twig perched on her bun with no evident means of attachment and by the disconcertingly asymmetrical musculature of her back. I'm not clear on what artist Alan Ayers was trying to do, there, but it looks like she's about to sprout wings at different heights on either side, or perhaps have an alien or two burst forth.
Overall, this is well-written fantasy that, if not exactly groundbreaking, is entirely competent at Carey's trademark mix of magic, action, and hot sex. I enjoyed reading it and recommend it to anyone who enjoys the erotic-epic fantasy subgenre.
I guess Maghuin Dhonn's Unspecified Destiny doesn't quite have the same ring to it.
I for one would be strongly tempted to buy a book with the phrase "Unspecified Destiny" in the title, but I'm weird that way.
Posted by: AJ | June 19, 2009 at 07:43 PM
If she falls into bed with most of the other major characters, maybe she should have a doctor check her inner ear.
(BONG!)
Ow.
I guess I did ask for that frying pan.
You say that the book isn't a standalone, but is it necessary to know the previous trilogies to approach this one?
Posted by: Serge | June 19, 2009 at 09:07 PM
AJ... I for one would love reading a short story titled "Unspecified Destiny". It sounds like something that I'd find in "Realms of Fantasy" - which by the way resumes publication at the end of this month. But I digress. Why don't you write that story, AJ?
Posted by: Serge | June 19, 2009 at 09:10 PM
You say that the book isn't a standalone, but is it necessary to know the previous trilogies to approach this one?
Actually, I think you might not have to. The others center around the d'Angelines, but this one goes through plenty of explanations because for the first time the protagonist is not d'Angeline. So it all has to be explained to her, which I think will carry the reader along as well.
I'm not the best judge of this, since I've read the others and since I was reading it for pleasure more than with a critical eye.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 20, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Thanks, Susan. I'll keep that in mind when it comes out in paperback. It's not like I don't have plenty of stories that await my hungry eyes. Still, I'm interested in trying new stuff.
By the way, I've begun reading Sean Williams's The Grand Conjunction, 3rd in his Astropolis story, and I came across the following:
It's not every day that I find my name in a superduper space opera, even if it's as a disreputable member of a futuristic society.
Posted by: Serge | June 20, 2009 at 12:46 AM
Maghuin Dhonn's Unspecified Destiny
I'd buy that book too.
I can't help thinking that the publisher would insist on making it a mysterious or strange destiny which would drain all the quirkiness out of it.
Posted by: Neil Willcox | June 20, 2009 at 09:11 AM
Neil...
Maghuin Dhonn's Unspecified Destiny sounds like a movie by Neil Jordan, or like a sequel to Sayle's Secret of Roan Inish. Like you said though, if it happened, they'd drain the quirkiness out of it.
"You cannot escape your destiny. You must face Darth Vader again."
- Obi-wan Kenobi to Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi
"It is unavoidable. It is your destiny. You, like your father, are now mine."
- the Emperor to Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi
"You underestimate the power of the Dark Side. If you will not fight, then you will meet your destiny."
- Darth Vader to Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi
"But beware. Anger, fear, aggression. The dark side are they. Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny."
- Yoda to... well, you get the idea.
Posted by: Serge | June 20, 2009 at 10:07 AM
I believe the thing that looks like a stick is supposed to be understood as being wrapped around her bun - if you look closely at the left end, you can just see the bit continuing around the back (it's in shadow, and blends somewhat with the background).
About the musculature, I choose not to venture an opinion.
Posted by: Paul A. | June 20, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Paul A... Maybe the artist was told to add the stick/wraparound after the painting was done. Or maybe he/she just is no good at sticks or wraparounds.
Posted by: Serge | June 20, 2009 at 04:36 PM
Serge,
Glad to hear that Realms of Fantasy is coming back. I might have to actually go out and buy it to help ensure that it sticks around.
I'm not great at short stories (I've only written one that I think is good, not counting RP character background stories), but once my new burst of enthusiasm for my novel has waned, I may tool around with some "Unspecified Destiny" ideas.
Posted by: AJ | June 20, 2009 at 07:25 PM
Go for it, AJ!
Posted by: Serge | June 20, 2009 at 08:23 PM
I don't read fantasy, but Julie E. Czerneda's SF has the female protagonists always doing things with their hair. It's very weird, reading a page and a half of a biologist fiddling with her hair every couple of chapters. It makes the protagonists in the different books seem very similar.
On the other hand, I'm almost done with Jo Walton's newest book, Lifelode which is very different and very intriguing.
Posted by: Marilee J. Layman | June 20, 2009 at 09:47 PM
Marilee... I don't read fantasy
I go for both myself, but I seem to prefer SF at the longer lengths, while fantasy works better at the shorter lengths - for me anyway.
Posted by: Serge | June 20, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Since I have long hair myself, I've experimented with all sorts of things in/on a bun, and let me say that twigs are not high on the list of practical decorations. Either the wood is green, in which case it is too springy to stay curved, or it is dried out, in which case it's going to be too hard and brittle to curve around. A straight twig with minimal rough spots (bark removed, perhaps) could be used as a standard hair-stick, but that's not what the artist is showing here. I'm sure it's meant to symbolize how, um, earthy and wild the character is, but I'm not buying it with that hairstyle and robe. Concept fail.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 22, 2009 at 06:51 AM
I'm actually not convinced it's a twig. I'm looking at a smaller-than-actual-size image on a computer screen, so I may be missing some detail, and of course I don't know what the character wears in the text, but to me it looks like it could just as easily be a twisty thing made out of gold.
Posted by: Paul A. | June 22, 2009 at 09:24 AM
Could it be a flimsy scarf on the bun?
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 10:26 AM
Looking at the cover on Amazon, I think Paul's suggestion that it's made of gold seems plausible.
Based on what I can see of it, I don't think it's practical. I'd expect to see the top part clipping somehow to the bottom part on the right side, but there's no sign of anything there. Even with a clip there, the way it's positioned certainly wouldn't hold my hair up like that. There would need to be an awful lot of other bands and clips hidden in the hair to hold it up that way, and that wouldn't make sense for quick leaps into bed.
Posted by: Carol Witt | June 22, 2009 at 11:27 AM
As I recall Phedre made great use of the poorly-explained "Lover's Haste Knot", although mostly when rising from bed in a hurry. So far as I remember it had the great advantage of being fast, easy and not requiring any pins, bands, clips, sticks or other accessories.
Presumably one needs angelic ancestry to get hair that does that.
Posted by: Neil Willcox | June 22, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Sidonie used that knot as well. That's the sort of thing that works if your hair is curly or coarse-textured, but not if (like mine) it's fine and slippery. But I can hold a bun in place with just one hairstick and put it up pretty quickly. With a scrunchy or band and a hairstick I can put up a bun that will last through vigorous dancing.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 22, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Also, looking at her back: maybe it's a giant "N" that is about to break through the skin? N for Naamah?
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 22, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Susan... I can put up a bun that will last through vigorous dancing
...must... NOT... make joke... must resist!...
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Chiming in as another long-haired lady, I will agree with Susan that it is very quick and easy to twist a bun that can be held in place with a single stick (my sticks of choice are fancy chopsticks purchased for $2-3 a pair in Chinatown). In fact, it was taught to me as the way all of the Indian ladies at Gem Show twist their hair up and have it stay in place without anything holding it, but I can rarely get the tension right for that -- and it would definitely not hold up to dancing or a long day at gem show without a stick.
Posted by: AJ | June 22, 2009 at 01:26 PM
AJ... Off topic, but I wanted to let you know that my steampunk-movie presentation at FiestaCon will be on July 4, at 2pm. Eek.
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 01:39 PM
Serge,
Did you ever get straightened out with the con whether you were doing a solo talk or a discussion panel?
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 22, 2009 at 01:51 PM
Susan... Not yet. They're supposed to put panel participants in touch with each other, but I haven't heard back yet. And the con less than 2 weeks away... Not much time left to finish my talk's text, whether I wind up using it or not. I'll have many pretty pictures anyway.
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 02:13 PM
Well, if you have a co-panelist it's probably meant to be just a discussion, not a one-person presentation. You really need to contact the head of programming or whoever your contact has been and straighten this out.
AJ,
I think Indian women have thicker hair with a rougher texture, which probably makes it easier. Mine is so fine it just slithers when I try to knot it without any accessories. Drives me crazy. My friends with curly hair do not have this problem!
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | June 22, 2009 at 02:21 PM
Susan... Good idea. I just wrote to the con.
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 03:43 PM
Holding a bun in place with one stick can work, but I don't think it can the way that stick is placed on that cover (as I recall it, since I don't feel like opening that window again).
My hair is currently braided and twisted into a bun without accessories, but I don't expect it will last. I should put something in -- it got quite warm here with the start of summer!
Posted by: Carol Witt | June 22, 2009 at 03:46 PM
When I had long hair, I could hold a braided bun up with a stick. I need to get the short hair off my forehead and neck now so I ordered a batch of cheap cotton bandannas from Oriental Trading that are due soon.
(We've had a massive commuter train collision just north of DC -- one train ran under the other -- two dead, more than 100 injured.)
Posted by: Marilee J. Layman | June 22, 2009 at 07:09 PM
Serge,
Awesome. My husband's usual Saturday game is canceled for the 4th, so I'm going to try to convince him we should go up to FiestaCon that day. I just need to see if my folks are free to come let the dogs out and feed them their dinner, since I didn't arrange to have them boarded for the day.
The dogs. Not the parents.
Susan,
Most of the Indian women I've seen seem to have thick but reasonably straight hair. I think the thickness is what helps. Mine is average thickness and a little wavy. It looks nice down, but if it's hot or windy, I just have to wear it up.
Posted by: AJ | June 22, 2009 at 08:30 PM
AJ... Let's hope you can make it. I've talked to Michael Contos and we've agreed that the first part of the steampunk-movie panel would be my talk about the past and that he'd then do the future and what the audience would like seeing made into a movie. The day before, he and I will be on a steampunk-literature panel, but he'll be in charge. (By the way, which room is the Capistrano? Not the biggest one, I hope. I'm not sure what would be worse, a big room filled with people, or a nearly empty one.)
Posted by: Serge | June 22, 2009 at 09:54 PM
Well, I have to call a plumber tomorrow. Hopefully that will not eat all of my con-going money o.o
PS: today sucks.
Posted by: AJ | June 23, 2009 at 02:50 AM
AJ... Curses!
Posted by: Serge | June 23, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Well, if the plumber's over-the-phone diagnosis is correct, it's only going to cost between $100-200. And Chris (the husband) seemed amenable to a convention and a steampunk movie panel as a way to destress from constant work. So all that's left is getting someone to stop in and check on my puppies :)
Posted by: AJ | June 23, 2009 at 01:40 PM
AJ... Hopefully you and 'the husband' will be my guest for dinner after that steampunk-movie panel.
Posted by: Serge | June 24, 2009 at 01:08 AM
Serge, that would be very nice! My Mom agreed to come let the pups out and feed them their dinner, so we should be able to stay in Phoenix a little into the evening.
I'll be dressing steampunk-y for the convention. I thought about wearing belly dance clothes, but I get lots of excuses to wear those and not many to wear my bustle skirt, so steampunk wins :D
Posted by: AJ | June 24, 2009 at 04:06 AM
AJ... Let's hear it for the bustle and its rustle.
Posted by: Serge | June 24, 2009 at 09:57 AM
I can't help thinking that the publisher would insist on making it a mysterious or strange destiny which would drain all the quirkiness out of it.
Yeah, but if it isn't mysterious or strange...would it be any fun to read?
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | July 02, 2009 at 01:13 PM
it could just as easily be a twisty thing made out of gold
Yeah, it could be. I'm looking at the actual book in front of me now, and it is exceptionally shiny for a twig. On the other hand, it is textured rather like bark. And even if it's gold, it's still not clear exactly how it stays attached to her bun. Gold would make a rather heavy hair-ornament, wouldn't it?
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | July 02, 2009 at 01:15 PM
It's not the actual mystery or strangeness, but the description. Assuming it's the same novel and destiny, is it more interesting or fun to call it:
Maghuin Dhonn's Unspecified Destiny; or
Maghuin Dhonn's Mysterious Destiny?
Both are good but I like Unspecified more.
I note in passing such titles as The Strange Case of Benjamin Button and Lord John and The Private Matter which tell us nothing of the case or matter, but make them sound fascinating.
Posted by: Neil Willcox | July 03, 2009 at 04:05 AM
Oh, I get it. They'd just change the title, not the nature of the destiny. I completely agree that the version with Unspecified is much more intriguing as a title.
Sorry, I'm a little slow after three very late nights reading Anathem.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | July 03, 2009 at 05:01 AM
Oh I don't care what she calls it. I'd buy it regardless. ;)
Posted by: emily | July 08, 2009 at 02:02 PM