I was thrilled during my recent trip to the Stratford Shakespeare Festival to be able to finally buy a DVD of the Festival's 1999 production of Dracula: A Chamber Musical. This isn't a movie; it's a straight-up film done by TV Ontario of an actual evening of live theater with only a few moderate effects (fades, multiple camera angles) added. I saw the production in person ten years ago and own a copy in VHS, but with the advance of technology and growing layer of dust on my VCR, it's good that the Festival finally reissued it. I promptly bought two copies so I could have one to loan to friends, since for some unaccountable reason it doesn't seem to be available outside the Festival's bricks-and-mortar stores. (Left: Amy Walsh as Lucy and Juan Chioran as Dracula; click to enlarge.)
This version of Dracula is an original Canadian musical which intended to be a more accurate adaptation of the novel than the Hamilton Deane version, Dracula: The Vampire Play in 3 Acts, which was written and first produced in the 1920s and then revived on Broadway with Frank Langella in the late 1970s (presumably inspiring the Langella Dracula film). That's not a high bar; the Deane play, among other weirdnesses, swaps the names of the female leads, kills Mina (originally Lucy) off before it even begins, then makes Lucy (originally Mina) the daughter of Dr. Seward (in the novel, one of Lucy's suitors) and gives her Jonathan (who did marry Mina).
Richard Ouzanian's book returns both women to the stage with their proper names in a speaking/singing cast of only seven people (though three other women make silent cameos as Dracula's undead brides). Lucy Westenra (Amy Walsh) is Dracula's first victim; Mina Murray Harker (June Crowley) the second. Lucy's three suitors are combined into one, the young doctor Jack Seward (Shawn Wright). Dracula is magnificently sung by Juan Chioran, a favorite of mine since my very first Festival. Rounding out the cast are Roger Honeywell as Jonathan Harker, Michael Fletcher as Abraham Van Helsing, and a spectacular Benedict Campbell as the insane Renfield. Music and orchestration are by Marek Norman. Ouzanian directs, with Allan Myers additionally credited for the television version.
Where to begin?
This is more a Dracula in the vein (sorry) of the romantic vampires of the last thirty years. The visuals clearly reference Coppola's 1992 film, Bram Stoker's Dracula, with a long-haired Dracula sweeping dramatically around his castle in floor-length robes. Ouzanian takes fewer liberties with the story than Coppola but has a similar approach in blurring the lines of seduction and victimization. Helped along by Chioran's dark good looks and operatic voice, it's never quite clear whether Dracula is sincere in his love for Lucy --
Although we've never met
-- or whether he used those same lines on all the women currently floating around his castle. Could Lucy be his true and eternal love? We never find out. His seduction of Mina is more straightforwardly vengeful, retaliation for Harker's destruction of the undead Lucy.
But it's not hard to see the attraction in this production. The human men are stifling lovers in the Victorian style; the big first act love song between Jack/Lucy and Jonathan/Mina is "I will shelter you," though at least the sheltering goes both ways. Dracula, conversely, is surprisingly forward-looking for the late Victorian era:
I will show you how
Yes, we could live forever
If you love me now
Lucy, unexpectedly liberated, accepts the challenge to "long-forbidden pleasure" and to "love...without fear." As Dracula turns away to leave the garden where they've met, she is the one who pursues him and pulls him into a passionate kiss (left) before the traditional neck-biting begins. Lucy is pretty bland in the novel, but it's nice to see her portrayed as something other than a passive victim. Mina, likewise, isn't forced, just...lured. She embraces Dracula out of a combination of the attraction to the forbidden and pity for his centuries-long tragic undeath, which he milks for all it's worth in "The blood is the life:"
Flowing freely through my veins
But it takes as it gives
Until emptiness remains
She's strong enough to love Dracula out of compassion, but eventually rejects him and returns to her real love for Jonathan.
Also unconventional is the use of the prick of the thorns of a rose as a metaphor for conversion to vampirism:
Ouzanian certainly seems to have a grasp of the appeal of sadomasochism. And he gives Dracula most of the best songs and all of the erotic moments. His first kiss-and-bite scene with Amy Walsh (Lucy) is rivaled in her later song, "Let the night begin," when the unusually tall Chioran kneels at her feet and then sinks his teeth into her breast, as well as his open-shirted bedroom scene with June Crowley (Mina) licking blood from his chest.
Along with Dracula's duets with Lucy and Mina, the other standout performance in the show is Campbell's turn as Renfield (left), alternately staggering and threatening, perfectly conveying a terrifying combination of insanity, fear, and rage as he cleverly foreshadows Dracula's seductions via spider-and-fly metaphor:
Feel the gossamer thread
Be a part of the design
And when I am through
Yes, the web will be yours
But the pleasure will be mine
I really have to admire Ouzanian for this little bit of symbolism, a little musical echo of the role of the Black Freighter in Watchmen. Renfield is usually not that deep a character, but Campbell so perfectly portrays how tormented he is by his own insanity that you feel genuinely sorry when Dracula, stripped of illusion and romance, kills him during the reprise of the song.
I don't mean to neglect the good guys here, but except for Harker they really have much less appealing roles, though all the actors are vocally accomplished. Van Helsing is written, accurately enough, as a combination of scientist and religious fanatic: "They are the Un-Dead!" Seward...well, one never quite sees what the imaginative and romantic Lucy sees in the repressed Seward, though Wright does a lovely deadpan delivery of the funniest bit in the entire show. Speaking about Renfield:
For the past few weeks, his hobby has been catching flies. But now he has turned to spiders, and he keeps feeding them with the flies.
But overall, I am entirely in sympathy with her choice; give me an eternity of time and an exciting life, and I'd be reasonably content to sleep in a tomb and suck blood too. That tension between attraction and horror is what makes romantic vampires such a successful genre, of course. It certainly beats Van Helsing frothing about how "they KILL and they KILL and they KILL!" and waving Communion wafers and crucifixes around.
Roger Honeywell makes a wonderfully attractive Harker, however, who successfully handles the lengthy early scene-setting by singing of his trip to Transylvania and narrating his way through a minimally-staged carriage ride to Dracula's castle. His intense love for Mina, beautifully sung, drives the fight against Dracula and is instrumental in its final success:
Come the rain
You and I, love, will remain
Let the lightning
Split the sky
We shall triumph by and by!
A little about the production:
The staging is sparse, with minimal scenery (Dracula's study, a bedrooms, a rose garden, a tomb) and props. Video projection(?) in the background shows scudding clouds, sunset, and, I believe (it's hard to tell on video), a lovely rose window in the chapel where the Harkers marry. The only real special effect (actually done on stage, not by the filmmakers) is the burst of fire that destroys Dracula at the final sunrise.
There are relatively few costume changes: beautifully detailed white day outfits (accurate to the late 1890s, with their tiny sleeve caps) for the women give way to lovely nightgowns and negligees for the bedroom scenes. Lucy's hair subtly changes from light auburn to a pale blonde to match ashen makeup when she becomes undead. Dracula's initial transition from an elderly man's long grey hair to a more youthful dark shade (with Chioran's natural widow's peak) is done on-stage. Mina's corruption by Dracula is symbolized by a brilliantly red robe, discarded at the end of the show. The other men are in unremarkable Victorian clothing.
Musically, the show clearly aspires to be more a miniature opera than a standard Broadway-style musical. I sometimes found Ouzanian's staging rather static, with actors standing still and singing at each other or the audience more than actually acting or interacting. But I like the show and its music and the vampire story enough to overlook this.
Unfortunately, as noted above, I can't find any way to purchase this DVD other than going to one of the Festival stores in Stratford. I suppose they might do mail order. But if anyone else would like to see it, post here and we can see about getting you the loaner copy (Netflix: the Rixo version!)
If you just want a sampler, Cynthia Dale has recorded one of Lucy's songs, "Let the night begin," on her CD of show tunes, To Dream. It's not the original, but Ms. Dale (another Festival star) has a lovely voice, and the entire CD is worth having if you like show tunes.
Thanks again for lending me your copy of the DVD. I liked it, but my only criticism is the character of Renfield. I agree that the character was played well, but he seemed to be in the plot more than the story required. Mind you, it's been nearly 40 years since I read the novel, and his increased presence may actually be more faithful to Stoker's novel.
In case you're interested... Some time in the 1990s, I read that, when 1931's Dracula was released, it had also been filmed simultaneously in Spanish, using the same sets but with a different cast. It might be available on DVD.
Posted by: Serge | August 16, 2009 at 01:04 PM
Susan... give me an eternity of time and an exciting life, and I'd be reasonably content to sleep in a tomb and suck blood too
Dracula enters Susan's room.
She is nowhere to be seen.
He knocks on her coffin.
A muffled voice responds.
He lifts the coffin's cover a crack.
"Are you still in there?"
"My costume isn't ready yet."
"We really have to go. The sun is going to be up soon."
"I am not going out in a half-finished outfit."
She yanks the coffin closed.
Dracula walks away, shaking his head and muttering about how Susan has enough room in there to sew in spite of all the books she also keeps in there.
Posted by: Serge | August 16, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Serge,
I don't consider this to have been a faithful adaptation, so I wasn't worried about the size of Renfield's part. (A faithful adaptation would probably be pretty dull; it's a very tedious novel in some ways.) And I thought Campbell was fabulous in it.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 16, 2009 at 03:23 PM
Susan... it's a very tedious novel in some ways
Not unlike War of the Worlds then. I haven't read either in decades, but I did recently glance at the latter's beginning. The various adaptations have tightened up the famous opening narration to its essential words, making it more efficient than what Wells wrote.
Posted by: Serge | August 16, 2009 at 03:50 PM
Serge, I believe the Spanish 1931 movie is an extra on the Dracula set from a few years back. I still wouldn't mind getting that.
Susan, it's interesting that the silence of the brides causes the omission of the line from the original that echoed the longest in my mind, "You yourself never loved. You never love!" (I went and checked it, and I had the words right, and only had to fix the punctuation.) I suppose compliant silence is fitting for Stratford Wives.
Posted by: Kip W | August 16, 2009 at 05:07 PM
ps: Some Spanish Dracula. The first appearance of their Count reminded me of Andy Kaufman. More glimpses here.
Posted by: Kip W | August 16, 2009 at 05:17 PM
Kip W... I think you're correct and that the Spanish "Dracula" was an extra on the DVD set. It's interesting that they say it's better than the Lugosi version and not just because of Bela's acting shortcomings.
As for compliant silence being fitting for Stratford Wives... If people are going to start making vampire jokes, I'll have to bring up Marty Gear's about Dracula's meeting with Sherlock Holmes. But I will show the restraint that is lacking in some of Rixo's visitors. Heheheh
Posted by: Serge | August 16, 2009 at 05:47 PM
Kip:
Well, yes, lots of stuff gets omitted, but that line pretty much had to go if they're working with the premise that Dracula can love and (not entirely clear) that Lucy might be the reincarnation of his lost love.
Serge:
That doesn't need a joke; it's a book by Fred Saberhagen.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 16, 2009 at 06:04 PM
Susan... Right. I've never read the book, but I remember seeing it. In fact, the moment I made that earlier comment, I thought that at least one person must have written such a crossover. As for Marty's joke, I'll spare you. It was atrocious even when I first heard it - at the 1983 worldcon's masquerade, I think, unless that's when he made the one about drained corpses falling on a shed. Atrocious, which is why I loved them.
Posted by: Serge | August 16, 2009 at 07:16 PM
Susan... Have you heard of a novel called "The Dracula Dossier", by James Reese? It's not about Dracula himself, but its premise is that a theatrical tour of America in 1888 that Stoker was involved with gave him the basic inspiration for his novel. It's coming out in paperback on September 8.
Posted by: Serge | August 17, 2009 at 10:09 PM
Serge,
No, but it sounds interesting.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 18, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Speaking of vampires... I just finished the Locus issue that focused on Urban Fantasy. Apparently it doesn't refer to de Lint's stories, or to Emma Bull's War for the Oaks, but to kickass heroines like Laurel K Hamilton's. (Am I the only person who dislikes the word 'kickass' for its connotations of dismissive violence?) When I came Charlaine Harris's comments, I couldn't help but smile. Harris, who writes the Sookie Stackhouse novels, was on a panel with my wife at Boston's worldcon in 2004. After that was over, one woman approached Harris with her daughter so that she'd autograph a book for the latter. The young lady, probably 13, was such an obvious fan of Harris that she was almost bouncing off the floor.
Posted by: Serge | August 18, 2009 at 09:07 PM
I'm amazed Hamilton's heroines have any time to "kickass" at all, what with how busy they are having hot, kinky encounters with nearly every man they meet.
(ok, maybe I shouldn't judge her entire oeuvre on the single book I read, but still...)
I don't have a problem with the connotations of dismissive violence, but I do have problems with kickass heroines as a total cliche.
Posted by: AJ | August 19, 2009 at 01:09 AM
AJ... Kickass heroines have become rather cliché. To be fair, I've never read one of those books, but I've seen so many of them advertised that I find myself wishing for something else.
About how people have time for fighting and Other Things... What do they do for a living? They can't all be millionaires like Bruce Wayne. (This reminds me of a Batman story from 1990 where Wayne has been in a really bad accident and is taken to a hospital, where he's thoroughly examined, x-rays and all. The doctors find traces of so many past and recent bone fractures that they wonder how a lazy rich guy got them.)
Posted by: Serge | August 19, 2009 at 07:34 AM
Serge,
I thought this idea that urban fantasy has been redefined into the paranormal-sexy-vampire-etc. subgenre so interesting I just suggested a discussion on it as a panel idea for Arisia.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 19, 2009 at 01:46 PM
Susan... Apparently that transformation took even Tim Powers by surprise. If you want, I'll photocopy the whole thing and mail it to you.
Posted by: Serge | August 19, 2009 at 02:20 PM
Yes, I would be quite interested to read it.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 19, 2009 at 02:39 PM
In that case, Susan... Something will be showing up in your PO Box next week.
Posted by: Serge | August 19, 2009 at 03:12 PM
About how people have time for fighting and Other Things... What do they do for a living?
Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter ® raises zombies as I recall. And hunts vampires when there's a warrant out for them.
I managed to lose track where I was in the series, but from comments made by other readers it was before they slow to a crawl and generally stop being entertaining.
Posted by: Neil Willcox | August 19, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Neil... Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter ® raises zombies
She literally bought the farm?
"Farmer Blake, she had a farm, hee-hi-hee-hi-ooooooooooo..."
Posted by: Serge | August 19, 2009 at 05:14 PM
I've read two "Urban (sexual) Fantasy" novels.
In the Laurell K. Hamilton one (not an Anita Blake book), the "kickass heroine" was a private detective with an agency that specialized in matters of faerie. This would have made for an awesome premise, in my eyes, but unfortunately the book had her shipped off to the Unseelie Court where she slept with many unrealistically attractive men while half-heartedly trying to solve some crime.
In the Sherrilyn Kenyon one, the "kickass heroine" was the owner of a lingerie/kinky clothing boutique that catered to strippers and prostitutes, and her employee was a horribly stereotypical drag queen. I could figure out how she had time to hunt daemons, get it on with Roman vampire generals, and run her shop, but not how she found time to *sleep.*
This is also a common problem in roleplaying games set in the modern age... it's hard to hold down a day-job when you're secretly a mage, working for the gods, or a blood-sucking parasite. Most of the players I know go for the independently wealthy route, or the "hoping the GM doesn't ask me how my character is paying for these assault rifles" route.
Posted by: AJ | August 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM
AJ... it's hard to hold down a day-job when you're secretly a mage, working for the gods, or a blood-sucking parasite
I've never secretly working for a blood-sucking parasite. That has usually been my day-job.
Posted by: Serge | August 20, 2009 at 12:32 AM
In Tanya Huff's vampire series, the "Blood" books (Blood Price, Blood Trail, etc.) the (male) vampire's "day" job has been as a writer of historical romance novels. I thought that was hilariously perfect. In the TV show they made from the books they turned him into a writer/artist of graphic novels. I guess romance writer wasn't sexy enough for TV.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 20, 2009 at 06:22 AM
Susan... Maybe they thought that a male writer of romances couldn't possibly be a REAL man. (Whatever that is.)
Posted by: Serge | August 20, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Back in the mid-1980s, Marvel published a one-shot graphic novel called "Greenberg the Vampire". He made his living writing horror novels, and he was getting sick of it. Being Jewish, he was, if I remember correctly, quite embarassed at the influence that crosses were now having on him. Oh, and he made sure his mom didn't know that he was now a vampire. Or so he thought, until she said: "A mother notices when her son grows fangs."
Posted by: Serge | August 20, 2009 at 09:53 AM
I have Greenberg the Vampire. Very funny stuff.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 20, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Television being a visual medium, maybe they thought having lots of artwork scattered about the place would make better visuals than sitting in front of a computer typing, surrounded by reference books. To generalise unfairly, television people believe TV watchers have a bias towards pictures and against writing, hence making a writer/artist more interesting and therefore sexier.
Without actually reading or watching that particular series, obviously.
Posted by: Neil Willcox | August 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Neil.... The bias is probably even more pronounced today, considering that computers are so much quieter than typewriters were. No more manly hammering of keys.
Posted by: Serge | August 20, 2009 at 02:03 PM
Susan... Did Greenberg ever show up in other comics? It's like Michael Morbius, another Marvel vampire but biological. I liked his stories that were published in one of their B&W horror mags, but he never caught on. Last time I saw Morbius, it was a walkon bit in a Fantastic Four story in the early 1980s, and he appeared to have been cured of his vampirism.
Posted by: Serge | August 20, 2009 at 02:06 PM
We got True Blood's first 2 episodes thru NetFlix some time ago, but we finally watched them tonight. The fangs look a bit silly, but we like it enough that we'll probably get the rest. My wife especially likes Sookie's boyfriend because she prefers vampires to be dark-haired and brooding. Alas, my locks stopped being dark a long time ago, but she did say I brood a bit.
Posted by: Serge | September 06, 2009 at 11:27 PM
Where the heck did this post go? It's not appearing on the front page anymore, not for me anyway.
Posted by: Mary Aileen | September 07, 2009 at 10:38 AM
Oh, wait, there it is. Nevermind. (But it Moved!)
Posted by: Mary Aileen | September 07, 2009 at 10:39 AM
Mary Aileen... What post is it that came and went? Such behavior is appropriate for this thread, I guess.
Posted by: Serge | September 07, 2009 at 04:59 PM
The original post itself. First it disappeared off the sidebar, then it seemed to vanish altogether. But it's just farther down than it was. (Or maybe I'm just going crazy--always a short trip.)
Posted by: Mary Aileen | September 07, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Mary Aileen... maybe I'm just going crazy
It's more likely that the site's underlying code is acting up. Remember that Susan has expressed some of her displeasure to them in the recent past.
Posted by: Serge | September 07, 2009 at 06:23 PM
Frank Langella's Dracula is on TV right now.
The hair.
The hair!!!
Posted by: Serge | October 24, 2009 at 10:13 AM
I liked that Dracula! I even videotaped it way back when -- probably still have the videotape, though it's probably disintegrated by now.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | October 25, 2009 at 08:38 PM
Susan... You should meet local fan Patricia Rogers, who gave a pre-Halloween party this weekend. One of her rooms is the 'horror' one, and one wall has autographed photos of actors who played in vampire movies. There's even one of Vincent price, because he was in The Last Man on Earth.
Posted by: Serge | October 26, 2009 at 11:43 AM
Serge,
If her main interest is movies and actors we probably won't have much to talk about. I see more vampire movies than other sorts, but that isn't saying much! Most of my vampire collection is books, with a small batch of comic books and graphic novels as well.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | October 26, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Come to think of it, Susan, her interest in horror seems to involve mostly movies. As far as I know, she is also a reader of F/SF, but there were no books in that room. There are other parts of the house that I didn't explore though.
Posted by: Serge | October 26, 2009 at 12:38 PM
I saw this Dracula THREE TIMES when it originally opened in Halifax. There was a different actor playing Dracula at the time, but this was by far my favourite play I've ever attended at Neptune. (Apparently, as I felt the need to return again and again!) I think I still have the wonderful message left on my phone from Marek Norman, regarding a letter of appreciation I left at the theater for him, Richard, and the cast. Unfortunately I never got to see the TV version. Great memories though, I still find The Blood Is The Life, and Last Light Of The Sun playing in my mental soundtrack, on occasion!
Posted by: Darlene Miller | July 13, 2010 at 08:40 PM
Darlene,
You can get it on DVD from the Stratford Festival -- try calling their main store.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | July 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM
Can anyone help me I'm trying to get a copy of this for myself and have contacted the Stratford festival theatre store and they told me they are no longer selling it. I'd be happy with it in either vhs or dvd format. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Posted by: Trisha | October 02, 2010 at 01:34 PM
Hi Trisha,
I have a VHS copy I could sell you if you like -- I don't need it now that I have the DVDs. It's a wonderful production and I'm very sorry they've stopped selling it. Let me know if you want my videotape.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | October 15, 2010 at 01:58 PM
Thanks to the spam one of the Recent Comments begins "Women Sexy Lingerie on Dracula..."
That would be reference to Rocky Horror, right?
Posted by: Neil W | February 17, 2011 at 07:10 AM
A lot of the spams, like "Supra Shoes on A Clockwork Werewulf: ", do that. I think she needs a backup spamkiller.
Posted by: Marilee J. Layman | February 17, 2011 at 06:26 PM
This version sounds hugely entertaining... or perhaps it´s those promo pics with gorgeous red roses...
Posted by: Christine | June 07, 2011 at 09:08 AM
I mentioned to the festival's manager last week when I was there that it would be nice if they got that DVD back in print.
Posted by: Susan de Guardiola | August 16, 2011 at 07:03 AM
Is there any way to loan a dvd copy of this. My wife has been looking for a copy for a very long time.
Posted by: Marcin bekas | December 04, 2017 at 08:35 PM